Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

MEDIAWATCH

#MeToo and #BalanceTonPorc expose extent of sexual harassment

Read more

ENCORE!

Musical maestro Philippe Jordan on bringing passion to the Paris Opera

Read more

IN THE PAPERS

'Black day for democracy': Malta in mourning after top journalist is murdered

Read more

IN THE PAPERS

Has the Weinstein scandal 'freed' women from their silence?

Read more

THE DEBATE

Europe’s newest face: Kurz’s election win indicates rightward shift for Austria

Read more

FOCUS

Turkey's brain drain: Turning their backs on limited freedom, declining economy

Read more

TALKING EUROPE

Internet giants: Too big to be taxed?

Read more

TALKING EUROPE

EU’s Karl-Heinz Lambertz: ‘Empowering regions and cities very important for Europe’s future’

Read more

ENCORE!

Music show: Client Liaison, Boyz II Men & Jessie Ware

Read more

Europe

DNA tests cast doubt on royalty of some British royals

© Veteran MP/Creative Commons. A stained-glass window depicts King Richard III and Queen Anne.

Text by NEWS WIRES

Latest update : 2014-12-03

Scientists say there is “overwhelming evidence” that a skeleton found under a parking lot is that of England’s King Richard III, but their DNA testing also has raised questions about the nobility of some of his royal successors.

The bones of the 15th-century king were dug up in the city of Leicester in 2012, and experts have published initial data suggesting they belong to Richard, including an analysis of his curved spine and the injuries that killed him.

Richard was the last English monarch to die on a battlefield, in 1485.

In the new study – probably the oldest forensic case ever solved – scientists compared DNA from the skeleton to living relatives and analyzed DNA data identifying eye and hair color, which they matched to the earliest known portrait of the king.

“The probability that this is Richard is 99.999 percent,” said Turi King, a geneticist at the University of Leicester who led the research. When she and colleagues compared the skeleton’s DNA obtained from the ground-up powder of one tooth and a leg bone to samples provided by a 14th cousin on Richard’s maternal side, they found a perfect match.

Based on the skeleton’s DNA, King and colleagues hypothesized that Richard had blue eyes and blond hair in childhood, which darkened with age. With no contemporary paintings of the king available, they compared their findings to the earliest known painting of him, which depicts the monarch with light brown hair and blue eyes, painted about 25 years after his death.

The research was published Tuesday in the journal, Nature Communications.

Scientists also compared the skeleton’s DNA to samples from living relatives on Richard’s father’s side. They found no match, a discovery that could throw the nobility of some royals into question.

While researchers weren’t able to say where on the family tree the adultery occurred, they said the findings potentially raise questions about the legitimacy of Henry V, Henry VI and the entire Tudor dynasty, including Henry VIII and Elizabeth I.

Still, Kevin Schurer, pro vice chancellor of the University of Leicester and another study author, said claims to the throne are based on more than simply having royal blood and also rest on other things such as battlefield victories and royal marriages.

He said England’s current royal family – which has a line of descent from the House of Tudor – should not be worried.

“We are not in any way indicating that Her Majesty (Elizabeth II) shouldn’t be on the throne,” Schurer said.

Researchers said it was the first time there was scientific evidence that questioned medieval lines of succession in the monarchy.

Other academics said history is littered with claims and counter-claims of royal legitimacy.

“When Richard took the throne, he said his brother Edward should never have been king because he was illegitimate,” said Steven Gunn, a tutor in history at Oxford University.

Gunn said it was unlikely anyone would ever learn the truth behind the most damaging rumors about Richard – that he murdered his young nephews to hang onto his crown.

Still, Gunn said, a more complex picture of the king is now emerging.

“This opens up a new posthumous discussion about Richard’s legacy,” the
historian said.

“He has been misrepresented as just a king with scoliosis.”

(AP)

 

Date created : 2014-12-03

  • UK ROYAL FAMILY

    UK’s Prince William and Kate expecting second baby

    Read more

  • UK

    UK police probe new claims on death of Princess Diana

    Read more

  • FRANCE - UK

    French editor charged over royal topless photos

    Read more

COMMENT(S)