Don't miss

Replay


LATEST SHOWS

EYE ON AFRICA

Mashujaa day: Kenyatta and Odinga call for peace before election rerun

Read more

THE INTERVIEW

Kurdish referendum a ‘colossal mistake’, says son of late president Talabani

Read more

MEDIAWATCH

The new 30s club: NZ's Jacinda Ardern joins list of maverick leaders

Read more

THE WORLD THIS WEEK

Raqqa, Kirkuk, Xi Jinping

Read more

REPORTERS

The Dictator's Games: A rare look inside Turkmenistan

Read more

#TECH 24

Teaching maths with holograms

Read more

DOWN TO EARTH

Is China exporting its pollution?

Read more

#THE 51%

Are female empowerment adverts actually good for the cause?

Read more

FOCUS

The mixed legacy of 'Abenomics' in Japan

Read more

Sports france 24

Targeted funding behind Team GB’s success in Rio Olympics

© Odd Andersen, AFP | Gold medallist Britain's Jason Kenny next to Women's Omnium gold medallist and fiancée Britain's Laura Trott on August 16, 2016.

Video by FRANCE 24

Text by FRANCE 24

Latest update : 2016-08-22

Twenty years after a stinging Olympic failure in Atlanta, Great Britain has risen from the ashes to become a sporting "superpower" thanks to a judicious, if ruthless, allocation of lottery and public cash to the sports most likely to win medals.

Rival nations were left confounded by Team GB’s 27 golds (of 67 medals won) in Rio, putting them in second place behind the United States with 46.

Liz Nicholl, the chief executive of UK funding agency UK Sport, declared on Sunday that "we are one of those sporting superpowers now", while the Mirror newspaper called it “Britain’s Golden Age”.

But rather than revolutionary coaching, technology or even, as some more bitter opponents suggested, doping, it is the investment of hundreds of millions of pounds by the National Lottery (introduced in 1994, two years before Atlanta, where Britain won a single gold medal) and public cash in the last two decades that has paid off handsomely for Team GB.

But the allocation of money has been ruthlessly targeted, its only goal being the development of “elite” sports likely to gain medals.

Sports that don’t meet pre-Games medal targets have seen their funding cut, meaning grassroots facilities. Basketball, for example, which doesn’t stand a chance of winning on a global stage, has been starved of National Lottery cash.

Even if total funding was increased by 3%, to a total of 330 million pounds compared to the four years leading up to the 2012 London Olympics, only 20 disciplines were allocated funding ahead of the Rio Games.

Professor Steve Haake, head of the Advanced Wellbeing Research Centre at Sheffield Hallam University, told FRANCE 24 that while the allocation of funding to elite sports “could be seen as ruthless”, it was also a pragmatic way of “making sure taxpayers get value for money – we need to know that if we spend all this money we actually have a chance of winning”.

Haake also defended the fact that “fringe sports” were left out. “They get plenty of investment from English and Scottish authorities,” he said.

“The strategy is to put money into sports and to spend it wisely on the best athletes, the best coaches and the best infrastructure,” he said. “It is a common sense approach to achieve success.”

'Conveyor effect'

He also hinted that he expects such funding to continue and for Team GB to shine again at the 2020 Tokyo Olympics.

“If you fund an elite sport like cycling and continue to do so when it is successful, you get a conveyor effect that goes through into the future,” he said.

According to British media estimates, the government spent just £5 million per year funding Olympic sport before the disastrous 1996 Atlanta Games, where Britain finished with just one gold medal and 15 overall.

That sum increased to more than £50 million in the four years before the 2000 Sydney Games where Britain won 11 golds and 28 medals overall.

Before London 2012 it was spending more than £80 million a year -- and Team GB won 65 medals and came third in the table.

UK Sport chairman Rod Carr, a British yachting coach at three Olympics, sees the origin of today's success in a failure of funding at the 1996 Games in Atlanta when he was team manager.

"The reality was at the time of Atlanta, John Major (prime minister at the time) was kicking the whole lottery act through parliament and we were doing the best we could," Carr told AFP.

"Well, in the late 90s it would have been a bit of an act of faith, but by the early 2000s it was pretty obvious there was a linear relationship between medals and funding."

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)

Date created : 2016-08-22

  • 2016 OLYMPICS

    Rio bids a colourful farewell to the Olympic Games

    Read more

  • 2016 OLYMPICS

    France's Yoka wins super-heavyweight boxing gold

    Read more

  • OLYMPICS 2016

    Rio police seize passports of three Irish Olympic officials over ticket sales

    Read more

COMMENT(S)