Skip to main content
MUSIC INDUSTRY

Pink Floyd wins download court battle with EMI

Text by: NEWS WIRES
3 min

The London High Court ruled in favour of veteran rock band Pink Floyd on Thursday, barring their record company EMI from selling downloads of individual tracks from their albums, in order to "preserve the artistic integrity of the albums".

Advertising

REUTERS - British rock band Pink Floyd won its court battle with EMI on Thursday with a ruling that prevents the record company from selling single downloads on the internet from the group’s concept albums.

The outcome of a dispute over the level of royalties the band received remained unclear, however, as that part of the judgment was held in secret, the Press Association reported. A source close to the band said those talks were « ongoing ».

Lawyers said it was the first time a royalties dispute between artists and their record companies had been held in private, after EMI successfully applied for a news blackout for reasons of « commercial confidentiality ».

The ruling is the latest blow to EMI, the smallest of the four major record companies which is seeking new funds to avoid breaching debt covenants. An EMI spokesman was not immediately available for comment.

Owner Terra Firma is also embroiled in a legal dispute with Citigroup over advice and financing the U.S. bank provided to enable it to buy EMI in 2007.

And several top acts, including Pink Floyd and Queen, are reportedly in talks with other labels, following the exodus of the Rolling Stones and Radiohead since Terra Firma took over.


VALUABLE BACK CATALOG

Pink Floyd signed with EMI over 40 years ago and its back catalogue has been outsold only by that of the Beatles.

The band, whose albums include « The Dark Side of the Moon » and « The Wall, » went to court to challenge EMI’s right to « unbundle » their records and sell individual tracks online.

Judge Andrew Morritt accepted arguments by the group that EMI was bound by a contract forbidding it from selling records other than as complete albums without written consent.

The judge said the purpose of a clause in the contract, drawn up more than a decade ago, was to « preserve the artistic integrity of the albums ».

Pink Floyd alleged that EMI had allowed online downloads from the albums and parts of tracks to be used as ringtones.

The band’s lawyer Robert Howe told the court: « Prohibition applies equally to the digital product as it would to the physical product, as one would expect from the commercial purpose of the clause.

« There would be a digital free-for-all otherwise. »

Elizabeth Jones, representing EMI, countered that the word record « plainly applies to the physical thing there is nothing to suggest it applies to online distribution ».

The judge ordered EMI to pay Pink Floyd’s costs in the case, estimated at 60,000 pounds ($90,000), and refused the company permission to appeal.

Pink Floyd’s influential and acclaimed body of work is a coveted commodity. Members Roger Waters, David Gilmour and Nick Mason all appeared on the 2009 Sunday Times Rich List with personal fortunes estimated at 85 million, 78 million and 50 million pounds respectively.

 

Daily newsletterReceive essential international news every morning

Page not found

The content you requested does not exist or is not available anymore.